Five out of nine private security companies have opted to withdraw their case against the government’s minimum pay requirement for guards, set at Ksh30,000.
The decision however marks a shift in the ongoing legal battle between the firms and the state.
In a statement on February 20, the Private Security Regulatory Authority (PSRA) confirmed the development, indicating that these companies had agreed to adhere to the stipulated Ksh30,000 minimum wage.
“Take notice that the petitioners herein have wholly withdrawn the petition, together with the Notice of Motion application dated February 9, 2024, with no orders as to costs,” read part of the withdrawal notice.
The private companies that have decided to withdraw the case include, Victory Protective Services Africa Limited, Victory Consultants Limited, Senaca East Africa Limited, Hipora Solutions and Marco Limited.
Also Read: Govt Issues Ultimatum to Employers Over Payrise for Watchmen
Five Security Firms Withdraw Case Against Government
As per the regulatory authority, the case withdrawal ensures that private officers receive professional treatment and fair compensation.
“Despite numerous obstacles, the promised land for private security officers is within sight! The five private security firms have withdrawn their case challenging cancellation of their licenses for non-compliance with Kshs. 30,000/= minimum wage for private security officers (security guards) amongst other violations of the law,” PRSA said in a statement.
Furthermore, PSRA boss Fazul Mahamed lauded the five companies for taking the move saying that it was a clear indication that the companies have made the decision to pay their guards well.
“Just as a shepherd tirelessly tends to his flock, the Authority remains vigilantly committed to its legal duty to ensure that private security officers are treated professionally, with dignity, and are fairly remunerated, ” he said.
Also Read: Govt Revokes Licenses of 9 Private Companies [LIST]
Revoking of Licenses by PRSA
PSRA on February 5, 2023, cancelled the licenses of the firms for non-compliance.
Mahamed went ahead and accused the companies of operating against the law and not following the law.
Four days after the revocation, the nine companies contested the decision in court.
