Kenya’s journey toward nuclear power represents a complex intersection of national ambition and local reality. According to the Ministry of Energy, while the country’s installed capacity reached 3,321 MW in 2023, with demand growing at 4% annually, the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics reveals that energy costs consume 14.3% of manufacturing expenses. Further, the ministry reports that unreliable power supply costs the nation $57 million annually in production losses, underscoring the urgent need for stable power generation.
The Nuclear Power and Energy Agency’s (NuPEA) planned 1,000 MW facility in Kilifi County emerges as a strategic response to these challenges.
The International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) completion of its Integrated Nuclear Infrastructure Review Phase 1 and subsequent 2024 follow-up mission confirms Kenya’s progress in establishing comprehensive nuclear infrastructure.
However, this technical advancement occurs against a backdrop of complex social and economic considerations.
In Kilifi County, where site characterisation studies are underway, NuPEA’s stakeholder engagement reports reveal that 67% of local residents express concerns about safety and displacement.
The Kilifi County Assembly has documented potential relocation affecting over 4,000 households, highlighting the human dimension of this technological advancement.
These concerns gained further prominence when 47 MPs from coastal regions demanded additional safety guarantees and local benefit-sharing agreements.
Nuclear Power Benefits
The economic implications are equally multifaceted. The World Bank’s Kenya Economic Update suggests that reliable baseload power could reduce manufacturing costs by 23–30%, potentially generating 200,000 jobs across industrial sectors. However, the project’s implementation must be balanced against Kenya’s current debt-to-GDP ratio of 67.4%, as reported by the National Treasury in 2024.
Also Read: Kenya to Sign Nuclear Deal with Russia
Environmental considerations remain paramount. The National Environment Management Authority’s (NEMA) Environmental and Social Impact Assessment identifies significant challenges, including impacts on 12,000 fisherfolk and groundwater safety concerns affecting 300,000 residents. The Nuclear Regulatory Authority has established comprehensive requirements for environmental radiation monitoring and emergency preparedness, reflecting the project’s commitment to safety and environmental protection.
Regional integration adds another dimension through the Eastern Africa Power Pool (EAPP), which currently maintains 4,200 MW of interconnected capacity. With regional demand projected to grow at 5.3% annually through 2030, Kenya’s nuclear initiative could significantly enhance energy security beyond its borders.
ADVERT
Capacity Building
Technical capacity development progresses through established channels. The Kenya Nuclear Research and Training Institute’s collaboration with the IAEA’s Technical Cooperation Programme has resulted in 45 nuclear professionals completing advanced training. However, the IAEA emphasises the need for continued capacity building and regulatory strengthening.
NuPEA’s community engagement efforts, including 24 public forums reaching over 5,000 community members since 2021, demonstrate attempts to address public concerns. The agency’s proposed benefit package includes skills development for 2,000 local youth, $200 million in infrastructure improvements, and a $5 million annual community development fund. Yet, local leaders argue these benefits inadequately address long-term impacts and risks.
The political dynamics require careful navigation. The Council of Governors’ 2024 position paper emphasises the need for meaningful consultation and revenue-sharing frameworks. This highlights a broader challenge: balancing national development goals with local autonomy and rights.
The Future of Nuclear power
Looking forward, Kenya’s nuclear power program must address several interconnected challenges. These include strengthening democratic participation in nuclear policy decisions, ensuring fair compensation for affected communities, and establishing independent environmental monitoring mechanisms.
The Korea Nuclear Power International Cooperation Agency’s involvement brings crucial expertise but also raises questions about technology transfer and local content requirements.
Also Read: Kenya Partners with US to Enhance Preparedness for Chemical and Nuclear Emergencies
Success in this ambitious initiative requires more than technical excellence. It demands a new social contract between the state, affected communities, and development partners.
This must prioritise inclusive governance, equitable benefit-sharing, and environmental sustainability while maintaining the high technical standards required for nuclear power development.
As Kenya advances toward its nuclear future, the path forward requires a careful balance between national progress and local interests, technical capability and social responsibility, economic development, and environmental protection.
This complex endeavour will test not only Kenya’s technical readiness but also its capacity for inclusive and sustainable development.
Follow our WhatsApp Channel and join our WhatsApp Group for real-time news updates.
