Uganda’s decision to switch off the internet and shut down human rights organizations on the eve of its January 15, 2026, general election is not about security. It is about power.
When the Uganda Communications Commission ordered telecom companies to block public internet access from the evening of January 13, it claimed it was protecting the country from “misinformation, disinformation, electoral fraud, and related risks.” That language may sound responsible, but it disguises a far more troubling reality: a government afraid of its own citizens speaking, organizing, and witnessing what happens at the ballot box.
An election conducted in the dark is not an election—it is a performance.
The internet is not just a social platform. In modern Africa, it is the newsroom, the whistleblower, the polling agent, and the citizen’s megaphone. By cutting it off, the Ugandan state has removed the public’s ability to document irregularities, communicate across regions, verify official results, or mobilize peacefully. What remains is a controlled information space where only the government’s version of events can survive.
Repression in Uganda
Even more alarming is the suspension of Chapter Four Uganda and the Human Rights Network for Journalists–Uganda. These are not terrorist organizations. They are watchdogs—institutions designed to protect journalists, document abuses, and provide legal support to victims. Branding them as “prejudicial to security” reveals how far the definition of “security” has been stretched to include any form of accountability.
Also Read: Uganda Elections: Bobi Wine’s Home Surrounded by Military After Internet Shutdown
In authoritarian systems, truth itself becomes the enemy.
The condemnation from regional and continental bodies such as the Kenya Human Rights Commission, the #KeepItOn coalition, and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights is therefore not symbolic—it is necessary. Internet shutdowns have become a standard tactic across parts of Africa whenever elections approach. Tanzania used them in October 2025. Uganda is repeating the same script. Silence the networks, disable the witnesses, and then declare order.
But order without rights is repression.
The Ugandan shutdown will directly affect over 21 million registered voters. While hospitals, banks, and government payment systems will remain connected, ordinary citizens will not.
Also Read: Uganda Shuts Down Internet
This selective access tells its own story: the state wants to keep the machinery of government running while cutting off the people from each other. That is not public safety—it is information control.
Kenya should be paying close attention
Although Kenya has not yet imposed full election-time internet shutdowns, the pattern of digital intimidation—content takedowns, harassment of journalists, and surveillance—shows how easily such measures could be justified in the name of “national stability.” Uganda’s actions offer a warning: once governments discover that switching off connectivity shields them from scrutiny, the temptation to repeat it grows.
Democracy does not die only through coups and tanks. Sometimes it dies quietly, when a country’s data goes dark, its civil society is muzzled, and its citizens are left unable to speak to one another.
Uganda’s leaders may claim they are protecting the election. In truth, they are protecting themselves from it.
Follow our WhatsApp Channel and X Account for real-time news updates.
